ai

In the biblical imagination, God’s words bring the world into existence by command. Human speech accomplishes something different.

Kristi Noem lied to the public about Alex Pretti’s death, and everyone could see it. But not everyone cared.

Yuval Noah Harari’s history of information networks emphasizes two crucial characteristics: truth telling and self-correction.

Sometimes we glimpse magnificence in common occurrences. Science stumbles into poetry. We get a taste of singularity.

For some reason, it is sometimes easier for us to see personhood in a chatbot than in a fellow human.

While recovering from a hiking accident, I posed the same theological question to multiple AI spiritual counselors.

I’m sure there are good uses for AI in our churches. Prayer and preaching aren’t among them.

Frank and Mary Frost, the filmmakers behind a recent PBS documentary about the Jesuit paleontologist, have long seen him as a true visionary.

Two recent buzzy, twisty thrillers put gender dynamics at the center of the drama.

Both Apple’s “Crush” ad and Catholic Answers’ AI priest alarmed people. There’s some hope in that reaction.

I asked ChatGPT for a sermon. What it wrote seemed to come from everywhere and nowhere.

Our different responses to artificial intelligence point to different stories—and different Christian virtues.

What exactly is an “evil robot”? Who gets to define it?

The growth of artificial intelligence is opening a conversation for 
which ethicists and theologians are uniquely qualified.

As long as AI is trained on human behavior, it will tend to replicate our worst flaws.