A pivotal moment at the Brett Kavanaugh hearings
Accusations of sexual assault against Brett Kavanaugh turned his nomination to the Supreme Court from an expected political slugfest to a national deliberation on the message of the MeToo movement. Are the charges made by Christine Blasey Ford and Deborah Ramirez to be taken seriously, or are they to be shrugged off by those in authority—in this case, the U.S. Senate? What kind of shame and derision will the accusers have to face in coming forward?
Some of Kavanuagh’s defenders made their position clear by dismissing the charges out of hand and denouncing the accusers for smearing a good man’s name. More circumspect supporters acknowledged a need to hear from the accusers, but then insisted that the testimony wouldn’t alter their vote in Kavanaugh’s favor. Their assumption is that a moral statute of limitations has run out. Ari Fleischer, press secretary for George W. Bush, formulated a widely expressed view: youthful transgressions should not “deny [people] chances later in life.” If that were to happen, the argument goes, a whole lot of men would be disqualified from public service.
To which the reply must be: If so, what would be so bad about that? The cultural change that the MeToo movement is calling for is precisely a change in expectations and norms. Assault and harassment of women at any age is not to be winked at. The consequences of assault on women are deep and enduring; why should there be no consequence for men? In any event, no one is suggesting that Kavanaugh be disqualified from his current job on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, only that, if the charges are credible, he should not be elevated to the highest judgeship in the land. If the time indeed comes when no male candidates for the court can be found who aren’t subject to credible charges of harassment and assault, doubtless there will be many outstanding female candidates who could be considered instead.
An irony in the proceedings is that Kavanaugh presented himself as a champion of women, highlighting his role as coach of a girls’ basketball team. He insists he is innocent of the charges, and that the stories about him are totally out of character. That may be true. Yet if his ultimate goal is the empowerment of women, he could demonstrate that now by calling for the normal FBI investigation of the charges—which the Senate Judiciary Committee has so far failed to do. He could publicly reprimand his supporters who attack the motivations of the accusers, and he could acknowledge the courage it takes for them to come forward. He could make it clear that even an appointment to the Supreme Court is not worth having if it is pushed through without a full investigation of charges. That kind of stance might seem too much to ask of a candidate in his position in this politically charged moment. But it would be a powerful demonstration of character, and would help ensure that, however the proceedings end, they don’t end up as a historic setback for women.