A show about dependence

February 9, 2011

The last 10-15 years have seen a lot of innovation in
scripted television. The most notable trend has been in edgy, high-budget
dramas made for cable, but my favorite developments have come from the
broadcast networks: The West Wing's
mashup of ER romantic realism and
Tracy-and-Hepburn goofball wisecracking, Arrested
Development
's perfection of the sitcom shift from sound stages and laugh
tracks to tightly edited madcap plots, the
hit-or-miss beautiful mess that is Glee.

My current favorite is also a broadcast-network show, but
its most notable trait is how steadfastly conventional it is. Friday Night Lights--the finale airs on
the 101 Network tonight before being rebroadcast
later on NBC--has never exhibited much interest in pushing boundaries of genre,
subject matter or FCC-regulated taste. Instead,
the high-school-football-themed drama combines steady writing, soft-touch
directing and fantastic acting to produce a fully realized picture of a small
Texas town and its residents.

Actually, Friday
Night Lights
has been innovative in the area of production. The show relies entirely on
locations rather than sets, shoots scenes in single takes with multiple cameras
and employs an unusual degree of improvisation. But all this serves the show's
diligent realism, which is truly striking--especially given how rare it is for
a show to focus on middle America at all, much less in an authentic and
unironic way.

Part of this place-based realism is the central role of
Christianity--not as a very special episode but in
the week-to-week lives of the characters. "Few series," observes Time's James Poniewozik, "are as matter of fact about the importance of religion, be it expressed in church or in a
student's Christian speed-metal band." Poniewozik goes on to argue that Friday Night Lights manages to navigate
difficult political terrain without being divisive (spoilers ahead):

The underlying theme is, we need each other. Everyone,
even a teenager, is part of a web of dependence. You could see the show, from
the right, as an example of how the best social programs are a job, a family
and self-discipline; you could see it, from the left, as an argument for the
crucial importance of an underfunded government institution, the public school.
You would be right both ways.

FNL has
shown the same generosity and nuance in dealing with tricky social issues. A
Season 4 episode in which a player's estranged father dies in Iraq was a
complex depiction of grief, mixed emotions and war's impact on a small town.
That season, a student had an abortion. . . . FNL handled the story with such grace that even Andrew Breitbart's
conservative website Big Hollywood praised the episode's "dignity and
maturity."

Compare that to The
West Wing
's patronizing strategy for bipartisan ratings: a neoliberal
presidential administration appreciates that its left flank is obviously naive
(why is this obvious?) but is repeatedly surprised by the human decency of its
conservative opposition (why is this surprising?). I love The West Wing, but if I had to choose I'd take Friday Night Lights every time.

Plenty of critics share my enthusiasm, yet the show has
enjoyed limited commercial success. Hence the current arrangement: the finale
airs tonight on DirectTV before the season has begun on NBC, a partnership that
has kept the ratings-weak show on the air.

Friday Night Lights is
ostensibly about football but really about human relationships, and apparently
one or the other keeps a lot of viewers away. In one episode, I found myself
oddly moved by a game-winning block that a wide receiver delivers. I don't even
like football--but I know that wide receiver better than I've ever known any
character on television.