Prayer vs. the prayer breakfast

February 5, 2010

When faith-based advocacy groups hold a protest, they often dress it up
in prayer. It's not enough to say to the gathered people and (hopefully)
cameras that your faith compels you to speak out against torture or war
or inequality; you have to say it to God (but still in front of the cameras). This always strikes me as odd and mildly offensive.

So I was pleasantly surprised when I attended yesterday's American Prayer Hour and spent much of that hour in actual prayer. The event was organized
by a coalition of pro-LGBT groups as an alternative to the National
Prayer Breakfast: while President Obama attended a breakfast organized
by secretive Washington, DC group The Family, people around the country
gathered in solidarity with the gays and lesbians of Uganda, where
political leaders with ties to The Family have proposed shockingly harsh antigay legislation.

I
went to the Chicago gathering, one of four events anchoring efforts
around the country. While it was clear that the purpose for meeting was
to oppose The Family and the proposed Ugandan law, the event wasn't
really a protest. There were no banners or slogans and very little
finger-pointing. Instead, the theme was prayer: for the safety of
Uganda's LGBT community, for hope in place of despair, for the grace to
respond to hatred with love. While the 30 or so of us were a far humbler
gathering than the parade of foreign dignitaries and religious movers
and shakers in Washington, ours had the advantage of actually being
focused on prayer.

As for the president, both he and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spoke against the Ugandan bill, though Obama did so only as a brief aside. While Dan Nejfelt is right to claim this as an organizing victory, I share Mark Silk's wish that Obama had gone farther and criticized The Family itself for its connection to what he called an "odious" bill.

An even stronger statement would have been to skip the breakfast, but this was never a serious possibility, not even when it looked as if
the author of the offensive Ugandan bill would be there. Presidents are
expected to attend the National Prayer Breakfast, and it's hard to
imagine the administration determining that President Obama's
conspicuous absence would be worth the political fallout. Imagine the
headlines: "Obama boycotts prayer."

It's a shame, because the
National Prayer Breakfast isn't about prayer, and everybody knows it.
It's the keynote event of a week of networking opportunities for
powerful people, run by an opaque and troubling organization and
presented under a mantle of piety. True, some of the speeches are good. But we'd be better off without it.