Fearing and not fearing
For more commentary on this week's readings, see the Reflections on the Lectionary page, which
includes Schertz's current Living by the Word column as well as past magazine
and blog content. For full-text access to all articles, subscribe to the Century.
Working with this week's apocalyptic Gospel text evokes
memories of childhood experiences and teachings in a Mennonite congregation
with a fundamentalist understanding of Bible and life. Within that setting,
however, my family was solidly Anabaptist in outlook and rooted in social
justice concerns. My public school was, for a community in the middle of rural
Illinois, a virtual hotbed of ecumenicity, with all the major and many of the
minor denominations represented. All this made for some interesting tensions,
especially in a family with an ethos of discernment rather than rules.
As a young person, I did not always appreciate these
tensions--or the lengthy and lively family discussions they sometimes
engendered. But my vocation in biblical studies--especially as lived out within
a passion for the church--has led me to value tension and paradox more fully.
The apocalyptic and eschatological language of the New
Testament appears in lectionaries with some regularity, in Advent but also at other
times. As part of the biblical tension and paradox, these texts can serve us
well in a number of ways. They are one of the ways that reading the Bible is a
I find that engaging these texts requires keeping the
following in mind:
watchfulness is rooted in a social situation. Often this language and
demeanor emerges in groups that are or feel beleaguered. These issues are
multifaceted and complex, with respect to both first-century apocalyptic
and its 21st-century counterparts, but biblical scholars
interested in social world phenomena have insight worth exploring.
first- and 21st-century apocalyptic groups use language in some
specialized ways. Apocalyptic language tends to be colorful, sharply
contrastive and often hyperbolic. Furthermore, apocalyptic thinkers and
writers do not always maintain clear distinctions between figurative and
realistic uses of language. As leaders we are required to tend carefully
the possibilities for misunderstanding and the need to translate images
and concepts across significantly different views of the world, history
and the role of church.
importantly, and true for all Bible readers no matter our mindset or
theological commitments, apocalyptic thinking takes place within and under
the larger biblical understandings of fearing
and not fearing. We are to fear
(or reverence) God and God alone. Paradoxically and iconoclastically,
fearing God means we fear nothing and no one else. When God appears to
humans in the Bible, proper epiphany etiquette requires the humans to
prostrate themselves in reverence. But the next words from the divine
manifestation are "have no fear." The apocalyptic language and imagery of
the Bible serves this larger sense--not the other way around.