Studies show help and hurt that can come from how clergy talk about end-of-life care

Two new studies find that many clergy are both ill-prepared and reluctant to  engage in end-of-life conversations with terminally ill congregation members and their families.

The result, both studies suggest, is that more believers may be spending their final days enduring painful treatments with little chance of success in intensive care units rather than receiving comfort care at home.

One of the studies was a national survey of more than 1,000 clergy. The other involved in-depth interviews with 35 ministers from five states. The research raises three critical areas of concern:

  • More than three in ten clergy in the national survey said they would strongly agree with a congregant who said, “I believe God will cure me of this cancer.” Eighteen percent affirmed the belief that every medical treatment should be accepted “because my faith says to do everything I can to stay alive.”
  • In the in-depth study, spiritual leaders showed little knowledge of end-of-life care, including the benefits of palliative care and potential harms associated with invasive interventions. “Many grossly overestimated the benefits of aggressive medical procedures at the end of life,” researchers reported in the Journal of Palliative Medicine. Three-quarters said they would like more training in end-of-life issues.
  • The default position of many clergy, even those who personally believed it was against God’s will to suffer unnecessarily, was to merely support the decisions of dying congregants and their family members.

Such passivity has consequences, researchers said, in that it can enable congregants to seek potentially nonbeneficial treatments that are associated with increased suffering.

One study participant summarized the larger problem: “We have not done a good job . . .  preparing people to die—that they don’t need to live the last days of their lives under terrible and excruciating pain.”

The new studies are part of the National Clergy Project on End-of-Life Care. What is clear is the complexity in end-of-life decision making.

Spiritual principles such as the sacredness of life and the capacity for divine healing may come into conflict with other religious principles to comfort the suffering and place faith that God will care for individuals after this life.

For example, clergy were asked in the national study what they would talk about when visiting a patient with cancer and no hope for a cure. Fifty-six percent said it is important to encourage acceptance of dying as part of God’s plan. Two-thirds would place a priority on suggesting hospice as a good idea. Eighty percent said it is important to talk about heaven and life after death.

Yet, 60 percent also would strongly encourage prayer for physical healing, holding out hope for a miracle.

At one extreme, 18 percent of clergy endorsed the idea of accepting every medical treatment to prolong life, and 16 percent said doctors and nurses should do everything possible to extend the life of a patient.

The clergy most likely to place their faith in divine healing were from the black church, Pentecostal and evangelical traditions, and those serving low-income congregations, researchers stated in the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.

Clergy attitudes matter to their flocks. Clergy who endorsed life-prolonging religious values were approximately half as likely as other clergy to have a discussion concerning entering hospice, stopping treatment, or forgoing treatment. The absence of a clergy-congregant hospice discussion was associated with less hospice and more ICU care.

In the in-depth interviews, no clergyperson said aggressive care was an “absolute good.” Several said it hampered a good death, and one said it was an “absolute bad,” researchers reported.

Yet despite their own strong views, many clergy refrained from influencing decisions about end-of-life care.

The ministers said they did not offer guidance out of respect for the “free will” of congregants, but researchers said a lack of knowledge of medical consequences also played a role.

What can be done to assist clergy in helping religious people make better informed decisions about end-of-life care?

Clergy education is critical, re­searchers from both studies said. The studies concluded that clergy training focused on the intersection of religious values and medical issues at the end of life offer several opportunities for improving care, including:

  • Closing the gap between the clergy’s beliefs and actions.
  • Empowering clergy to counsel congregants about the moral and spiritual implications of end-of-life medical decisions.
  • Supporting religiously informed decision making by patients that minimizes unnecessary physical and spiritual suffering.
  • Creating partnerships of ministers and disease-based and palliative care clinicians.

What clergy say and do not say can make a major difference in whether believers experience a “good death,” the studies find.

“There are times,” one black minister from Chicago told researchers, when “death itself is a cure to what ails you. It’s the healing.’’ —

Reprinted with permission of the Association of Religion Data Archives

David Briggs

David Briggs edits Ahead of the Trend for the Association of Religion Data Archives.

All articles »