More brutal than nature

September 7, 2010

In the September 7 issue of the Century,
MacKenzie Scott observes that this week's readings find the world's
wrongs addressed, but not "by some goddess with a blindfold." Here
Scott looks further at the problem of injustice especially as found in
nature. To read the original column,
subscribe to the magazine. --Ed.

Bruce’s
dog intruded on the Easter sunrise service. It had caught a bunny, of
all things, and choked while attempting to eat it. This little reminder
of nature red in tooth and claw marred the morning’s tranquility. The
God emptying the borrowed grave in order to bring life and immortality
to light seemed complicit in the routine reality of a dog-eat-bunny
creation.

Of course we were in the Real World then, outside the
confines of church walls. Nature, which up to that point had been
seeming wondrously attuned to the miraculous—fleeing shadows, a growing
chorus of birdsong, each bead of damp a prism for the dawning sun—now
seemed violent, appetitive and prone to black humor.

We are not
yet at that place where the lion and lamb rest together peacefully and
the adder disdains to bite the infant’s exploring hand. There is a
deeper suffusion of God’s nature in creation coming, at God’s
initiative, by and by. For now we are still post-Eden, with all the
other creatures innocent of moral qualities, and ourselves
distinguished by having, both to our loss and our gain, eaten of the
Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.

The dog, by long
association with our species, looked ashamed once it had been
chastised. It was not, however, seeing things our way. Food in the wild
was simply food; the necessity for hunting as opposed to showing up at
the food dish was no great shift in perspective. Its experience was
that meat is desirable and then that choking is uncomfortable.

It
was also uncomfortable to have displeased its master, but that doesn’t
mean it was guilty. Guilt exists in a moral universe, and the way
Genesis sees it, we have moral obligations in our relations to other
creatures but they have no moral natures in themselves. Their
unreflective participation in the food chain is part of their innocence.

That’s
not the innocence Easter was celebrating. We were there to share a
dawning day marking both resurrection and rebirth. The old had passed
away, behold, the new had come! God through Christ had reconciled the
world to himself.

We looked away from the dog’s botched
breakfast. We weren’t prepared to see how a realm of routine predation,
of the innocent caught in the jaws of fate, was the world redeemed by
Jesus. It is though. Our own path is not always standing amid friends
at a hopeful sunrise. We live in a world inured to grosser brutalities
than the natural world knows.

Jesus’ own experience of
suspicion, opposition, betrayal, injustice, torture and death finds its
end in Easter; but that world is not at an end. Our advantage is that
we’ve seen the final act, the empty tomb and the living Christ, not
defeated. That’s our hope in an environment which can be beautiful or
bleak, meaningful or absurd.

The benefit of a beloved pet’s
exposing the world’s violence and insecurity is that it keeps our
religion fit for the real world. Otherwise we might imagine, like
Jesus’ contemporaries who didn’t like him consorting with sinners, that
it should be possible to be God’s person by refusing to be part of the
world into which we are born.

MacKenzie Scott is pastor of First Baptist Church in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania.