The lure of books

April 24, 2012

Jonathan Franzen, who won the 2001 National Book Award for his novel The Corrections, does not like e-books because they seem impermanent. “A screen always feels like we could delete that, change that, move it around. So for a literature-crazed person like me, it’s just not permanent enough.” By contrast, a printed book has solidity. “Someone worked really hard to make the language just right, just the way they wanted it. They were so sure of it that they printed it in ink, on paper.”

Regardless of Franzen’s complaint, e-book sales are on the rise. Publishers Weekly reports that whereas in 2010 only 100 books had digital sales of over 25,000, in 2011 the number of titles in that category rose to 340. In 2010 five e-books achieved over 200,000 in sales, and in 2011, 35 titles reached that figure.

But Franzen is certainly not alone in preferring printed books over digital ones. Some critics argue that digital forms are changing the way we read. In The Shallows, technology writer Nicholas Carr goes so far as to suggest that the Internet is rewiring our brains and changing the way we think.

Even fans of e-books admit that e-books are better for reading works of fiction or memoirs than for pondering dense philosophic or historical works, especially ones with footnotes, in which case the reader needs to be able to flip back and forth between pages easily.

One thing seems fairly certain: people will go on reading books in what­ever form they’re marketed. In one recent survey, reported in Alan Jacobs’s The Pleasures of Reading in an Age of Distraction, more than 90 percent said reading is a good use of one’s time. Asked whether they thought they’d do more or less reading in the future, 45 percent of those surveyed said more, 51 percent the same and only 3 percent said less.

Books in digital form are potentially more accessible to more people around the world. Someone with an Internet connection in Kinshasa can download the same books that are available to a person in Manhattan. Meanwhile, the Digital Public Library of America, working with institutions like Harvard and the Library of Congress, is hoping to create an online collection that will incorporate every volume ever published.

The lure of books will not go away. When we are curious, we read books for information. Dispirited, we read for inspiration. Bored, we read for entertainment. Stressed, we read for escape. Reading can help us capture a sense of solitude, but it also connects us to others—to an author, but also to a community of readers. Most readers enjoy nothing better than talking with other readers about the books they’ve read.

It is hard to think of a serious Christian not being a reader. Believers want to be more informed about their faith and to be challenged on how to live out that faith. That’s why a robust coverage of books, including book issues like this one, continues to be a large part of the Christian Century.


Letter from Emily Levine

I  was taken aback by the editors’ statement, “It is hard to think of a serious Christian not being a reader” (“The lure of books,” May 2). It sounds like the writers have a hard time imagining anyone not like them being a serious Christian. I work with people who have developmental disabilities and their families, and many feel unwelcome in their churches due to this type of dismissal of their loved ones.

Who qualifies as a serious Christian? Only the smart, educated, literate people who have resources and time to read to be more informed? Ouch!

Emily Levine
Milwaukee, Wis.

Jonathan Franzen said very

Jonathan Franzen said very well. Books should have more priority than a E-book. I used to follow writers quotes by essay writing service and writers from all over the world share the same answer when someone asked him the same question