Last
weekend, ESPN fired an editor who posted
a racially offensive
headline
about NBA player Jeremy Lin; the
network also suspended an anchor who used the same term. And taking the Lin
coverage as a starting point, SNL produced a parody mocking a media double standard: stereotypes about Asian
Americans are acceptable, but stereotypes about African Americans are
offensive.

The
Lin media storm exposes the myth of a colorblind society. As much as we want to
believe in meritocracy, equality and individuality, we rely on racial
assumptions to make sense of the world and those around us. In many cases, the
assumptions carry real consequences.

Some
have questioned whether Lin's journey to overnight sensation is the consequence
of prejudice. In a USA Today article, U.S.
education secretary (and former professional basketball player) Arne Duncan
argues that Lin "has been very good for a long time and just never quite had
the opportunity" because of stereotypes that "underappreciated and
unrecognized" his talent as an Asian-American player.

In
the same article, recruiting expert Jerry Meyer admits the following:

You just don't see that many good Asian-American players.
That doesn't mean they're not out there.... People don't expect Asian Americans
to be that good at basketball. We just have to be honest about that.... That's
crass, and that's stereotypical. Obviously, he's breaking that.

Undoubtedly
there are numerous reasons why Lin's abilities went unrecognized. (There are
many talented, hard-working players who go unsigned.) But race continues to be
a major factor in perceptions of Lin, from the offensive public comments to the
media emphasis on stereotypes as part of his underdog narrative.

At
the same time, it would be myopic to reduce Lin's success story to his
Asian-American identity, as Gabe Zaldivar observes:

We continue to bury it as an Asian story or about an
Asian-American that is making good on hard work. Even that pigeonholes this
remarkable man and his rise to prominence.... He went to Palo Alto high school,
where he dominated. After hard work, he went to Harvard, where he struggled to
get a consistent look. His struggles continued and were magnified at
the next level, but he never quit and kept pushing to see his dream through.
Look just past the color to the meat of the story.

Lin's
narrative has numerous unique and resonant aspects--race alone does not shape
his experience. And while many Asian Americans can relate to elements of his
story, his experience does not represent all members of his race.

Lin's
a 23-year-old, a son of Chinese immigrants, a California native, a Harvard
alumnus, a person of faith, an undrafted NBA player and a New York Knick. Even
as a high-profile figure, Lin should be given space to define himself on his
own terms, as more than an "Asian sensation" or a "Taiwanese Tebow." Why not
just let Lin be Lin?

Jane Messah

Jane Messah is an online editorial intern for the Century.

All articles »