Preferring the option not to have a preferential option

October 14, 2011

Last week, Faith in Public
Life asked Rick Santorum if he agrees with the Catholic teaching that public
policy should include a "preferential option for the poor." He appeared to be
unfamiliar with the concept:

To be fair, it's an awkward
phrase--I wasn't sure what it meant the first time I heard it, either. Of
course, I was a 20-year-old evangelical student at a college that declines to employ Catholic scholars, not an
uber-Catholic (Amy Sullivan's apt term) presidential
candidate and former fellow at a faith-based policy think tank.

Mark Silk points out that the kinds of Catholic thinkers
Santorum has worked with aren't big fans of the preferential option teaching.
That's certainly true; it's unlikely that the Ethics and Public Policy Center
will ever name a center for Gustavo Gutiérrez. But it's one thing to downplay a
teaching that you don't like, as the EPPC's George Weigel has done, and quite
another to be altogether unaware of it like Santorum.

However you interpret its
origins and significance, the notion of a preferential option for the poor is a
central element of Catholic teaching. It's quite telling that a veteran
politician who has routinely worn the "Catholic compassionate conservative"
mantle doesn't know this.