From shame to fame

July 13, 2011
An image of Lady Gaga made from screenshots of her videos by one of her many fans. Some rights reserved by qthomasbower.

Stefani Germanotta was an awkward teenager, at least as she remembers it. Her peers bullied her for being ugly, for having a big nose and giant eyebrows. They teased her for her laugh, for her love of theater, for her penchant for constantly sing­ing, for the way she wore her makeup. They made fun of her tan and her hairdo. "I used to be called a slut, be called this, be called that. I didn't even want to go to school sometimes," she says.

Now Stefani Germanotta is world-famous as Lady Gaga. Her shows are filled with memorable theatrics—brassieres that shoot sparks, dresses made of meat, intricately choreographed dances, lots of fake blood and real fire. These concerts are among the most popular in music today, and her television performances are eagerly awaited as viewers wonder what she'll come up with next. (This year at the Grammys she was carried onstage in and emerged from a giant egg.)

Despite the stratospheric levels of her success, she ­hasn't forgotten being a misfit. "It wasn't until I put my music out into the world that I was able to look into myself and honor my own misfit and honor the reality of how I was treated when I was a kid, not by my family, but by my peers in school, and how it affected me."

Consequently, Lady Gaga's message to her devoted fans is that it is all right for them to be "little monsters." Others may regard them as too fat or too skinny, or harass them because they are gay or otherwise different. But as their Mother Monster, she reminds them that they have real worth. In concerts she tells them she was (and is) a misfit, but look at her now. She promises them that they, too, may one day stand on a stage at Madison Square Garden and soak in lapping waves of applause. She shares her fame and herself with them—Lady Gaga is always "on" for her public—and regards her fans as "at least 50 percent, if not more," of her person.

In turn her fans not only adore her but begin to re­spect themselves. A 15-year-old boy writes representatively, "I am an extremely devoted little monster, and I'll be a little monster for life. . . . At every concert you've said that you want to liberate us, and that is what you've done. Your songs have taught me not to listen to haters and be who I am, because, baby, I was born this way!"

It is not too much to say that Lady Gaga has a mission of liberating her fans, or that she ministers to them in her flamboyant, over-the-top way. In fact, Gaga's message resonates with the gospel. To paraphrase Will Campbell, the gospel message is that "we're all misfits, but God loves us anyway."

Particularly in the church's youth ministry, it seems as if the strategy is often to reach out to the most beautiful and successful, to recruit the winners and then let all the (relative) losers follow them into the group. Maybe this strategy "works," but Lady Gaga is a reminder that there is an alternative.

Lady Gaga is a Kierke­gaard in fishnet stockings, who can play piano and guitar. Whether she intends to or not (and however sacrilegious such songs as her "Judas" may appear), Lady Gaga reminds us that Jesus came among us as a misfit, born into a feed trough. He lived itinerantly, with no real home or place to lay his head. He was an outcast who re­cruited rough-hewn fishermen and despicable tax collectors as his followers. And finally he ended up beside the most despised of the de­spised, crucified naked on a humiliating Roman cross. Suffice to say he surely was not voted "most likely to succeed" in his high school.

The strict dictionary definition of monster is something or someone who "deviates markedly from the normal type." In this sense Jesus Christ was a monster, right down to the orthodox confession of him as both "very God" and "very man." A king who rode a donkey, a savior who died, he overturns our ordinary, ideal definitions of divinity and humanity. We can even add that he was given to theatrics, such as pulling coins out of fishes' mouths, walking on water and driving moneychangers out of the temple.

Kierkegaard was at pains to defeat all prettification and accommodation of the gos­pel, to remind those who would call themselves Chris­tian that Jesus when he lived on this earth was widely despised and rejected, treated like a monster. And if that Jesus is the Jesus who calls us to be like him, even to be a part of his body, then Chris­tians are the original little monsters. Lady Gaga is playing a variation on an old song.



I like Gaga too but not because of her messianic qualities. I appreciate her long hard work, her persistence, the tedious hours of labor, the practice over and over again, in this club, in that club, against all odds, against her father's advice. She rose, but it was not miraculous, it was by trial and error, her being at the right place at the right time, her humility and humanity (yes humility... she doesn't have the body to support her glamorous presentation... her awkward fat hangs out of her soft not fit body... she doesn't care... it is just a body to use for her benign purpose and she knows it... she was...born that way). The same could be said of Taylor Swift. Not that pious Swift is anything like profane Gaga, except they are both shrewd hard working people who have tapped into "that" creativity which only comes with sweat and tears. There is nothing religious about Gaga other than the fact that she can draw a crowd. I love her not for lewd displays but because she has worked hard to succeed and she encourages others to do likewise.


Hm, this one seems like a bit of a stretch. Surface level similarities to Jesus and the Gospel aside, I think Lady Gaga's message fits more the spirit of the age - a fiercely individualized expressivism: I am who I am no matter what others think. I worry that too much of this message from big name entertainers breeds nothing much more than resentment and raw self-assertion.

Perhaps not so much of a

Perhaps not so much of a stretch; after all, Romans 8:1 has covered a multitude of misdeeds for a couple of millennia, despite the original intent. For a fascinating read on Gaga, check out the essays on the blog Gaga Stigmata: Critical Writings and Art About Lady Gaga ( Some of it is academic drivel, but there are occasional flashes of critical brilliance!

Jesus is a monster? Does he want to hurt us?

I agree. And when that raw self-assertion doesn't pan out into the kind of success and acclaim that Gaga's monsters expect, some pretty destructive self-hatred would follow, I'm betting.
And I hardly think that a poster child for the American dream --growing up working class in New York City and working hard on her art and performance, eventually becoming an international superstar-- is by the same token an exemplar of the Gospel. And the word monster comes from the Latin "monere" --to warn. Jesus was different, to be sure. Jesus was a radical personality. But Jesus was not someone to be warned about. Jesus warned others about the monstrous expectations of the Pharisees, about the end times, etc. Jesus was not someone who was himself dangerous and untrustworthy. . . sigh. Can we please be more careful with the English language and not compare Jesus to super-rich entertainers who celebrate dysfunction and disintegration, and not call Jesus--who is the greatest human who ever lived-- a monster--meaning roughly something that is inhuman or subhuman?