This quote from a local news
story made the rounds on Facebook recently:
Jackson said she likes shopping at the Dollar Palace because it is convenient
don't have to get all dressed up like I'm going to Wal-Mart or something," she
Naturally, the Facebook
commenters focus on mocking Jackson for suggesting that Wal-Mart has a dress
code. (There's nothing as hilarious as the perspective of someone below you on
the class scale!) But her comment points to an important trend: dollar stores
have usurped much of Wal-Mart's appeal among low-income people.
With consumers focused on
thrift, the Dollar Palace is to Wal-Mart what Wal-Mart once was to Sears: the
bargain alternative for folks with less to spend. In response to the
dollar-store boom, Wal-Mart recently started experimenting with "express" stores less than
a tenth the size of a Wal-Mart Supercenter.
Liza Featherstone observed a while back that competition from
dollar stores is one factor contributing to Wal-Mart's aggressive push to
expand into northern cities, unions be damned:
unemployment high, Wal-Mart's core customers have become simply too poor and
too frugal to do much shopping. The retailer has been losing out to dollar
stores, where one can make smaller purchases: The poor are becoming too poor to
buy in bulk. As fuel costs become a daily nail-biter for so many, it's also
important that the dollar stores are more easily reached on foot or by bus. . .
. Wal-Mart has saturated rural and suburban America. . . efforts to expand overseas
haven't gone well, and. . . the company needs new markets. Urban America is the
only place left for Wal-Mart to grow.
As Featherstone (and many
others) point out, Wal-Mart has always positioned itself as a sort of anti-Henry
Ford: it sells stuff cheap and pays its army of employees poorly
enough that they can't afford to shop anywhere else. But with dollar stores on
the rise, this strategy is starting to look unsustainable.
Wal-Mart's new position as
a step-up retailer for those with a little more cash on hand leads Featherstone
to suggest that "Wal-Mart's interests [could] eventually align with labor."
That's an intriguing thought, but in a climate in which it's hard to get anyone to speak an unqualified word in
favor of union rights, I won't hold my breath. In the meantime, I won't lose
any sleep over the fact that a pioneer of some truly ruthless business
practices is seeing some of them backfire.