Another Twitter frenzy

June 3, 2011

I don't know whether Rep. Anthony Weiner sent a lewd photo
of himself to a college student via Twitter. The evidence is mixed: on the one
hand, Weiner's claim that someone else sent the photo as a prank is quite
plausible given security
holes
(since fixed) in photo-sharing service yfrog. On the other, the
unfortunately named Democratic congressman's evasive
behavior
in the last couple days doesn't exactly scream innocence.

I do, however, want to make two quick points about social
media:

  • Twitter is almost five years old, and people
    still routinely make judgments about it without understanding how it works.
    Rep. Weiner has some questions to answer, but "why
    were you following the Twitter account of a young woman you don't know?
    "
    isn't really one of them. A few possibilities based on my own experience: Maybe
    she sent him a form message asking him to follow her. Maybe she posted
    something interesting once. Maybe he briefly set an application to respond in
    kind to all new followers and then changed the setting without bothering to
    unfollow them. In any case, one important way Twitter differs from
    Facebook--both technically and in terms of user conventions--is that lots of
    people follow users they don't know, often for no particular reason.
  • An incident like this might tempt you to
    criticize social media and pine for the good old days of pre-web journalism.
    But as is so often the case, most of the deep research and reporting on this
    story hasn't been done by print journalists and broadcasters. It's
    been
    done
    by bloggers and Twitter users.

As always, it's important to remember that social media
(like a newspaper or a broadcasting license) is a tool that can be put to many
uses, good and bad. This is simply a particularly colorful example of the
latter--whether the culprit turns out to be Rep. Weiner himself or someone
trying to smear him.

Elsewhere, Ruth Graham compiles
a list
of members of Congress for whom this would be a less scandalous
incident.

Comments

Weiner is just another far-left liar

Steve, you offer the obligatory disclaimer that Weiner may not be innocent, but most of your comments seem to suggest that Weiner was framed, or the victim of a prank, or the victim of a hacker (like conservative Andrew Breitbart, who was inaccurately and maliciously maligned in this whole affair). It seems your natural reaction is to defend the liberal. Would you have counseled us to reserve judgement had Newt Gingrich been the pant-less one?

And how about giving a little love to Breitbart for being lied about??