Will Romney, Huntsman help or hurt Mormons?
c. 2011 Salt Lake Tribune
SALT LAKE CITY (RNS) Amid the prospect of presidential runs by Jon
Huntsman Jr. and Mitt Romney, reporters are bombarding the Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints with calls about the potential
candidates and their Mormon faith.
So much so, in fact, that the Utah-based LDS Church decided it needed to reiterate its longstanding stance of political neutrality.
"The church is strictly neutral in matters of party politics and will not comment at all on the personalities and platforms of candidates, whether or not they are members of the church and irrespective of their party affiliation," the church said in a statement released Feb. 1.
The novelty of two high-profile Mormons possibly competing for the nation's highest office guarantees the 14 million-member faith a place in the national spotlight. But experts are divided about whether that would help or hurt the church and how much of a factor Mormonism would be in either potential campaign.
"In the long run, it would be good for the church," said David Campbell, a political scientist at the University Notre Dame and a Mormon.
"It would mean we were entering the mainstream of American society. After all, we would have not just one but two candidates -- plus Harry Reid (the Senate majority leader, a Democrat from Nevada)."
Campbell said a run by Huntsman -- who's stepping down as U.S. ambassador to China -- would "totally change the dynamic of the way Mormonism is discussed."
For example, if Republicans Huntsman and Romney disagreed about issues, as they no doubt would, that would undermine the view that "Mormonism is monolithic, that members all march in lockstep," said Campbell, co-author of "American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us."
Campbell and co-author Robert Putnam collected data in 2007 and 2008 ranking Mormonism among the nation's least-popular faiths.
Romney's first run at the White House "did not change attitudes toward Mormons, either among those who liked him or didn't," Campbell said. "Attitudes about Mormonism were fixed."
John Green, an expert in religion and politics at the University of Akron in Ohio, agreed.
"If we have two Mormon candidates in the race, (Mormonism) becomes less of an anomaly," Green said. "You may see somewhat greater acceptance (of Mormons) on the part of the general public."
Still, though the political context may have changed from the 2008 campaign, he said, the same underlying attitudes that created difficulties for Romney remain.
Mormonism continues to be among the least popular religions in America, Green said, and white evangelical Protestants -- a force in the GOP -- view the faith's doctrines with suspicion and its missionaries as "competitors" for converts.
White evangelicals are especially influential in states such as South Carolina, Georgia and Florida, Green said, and would pose a large hurdle for any Mormon candidate.
Huntsman, who has described himself as not "overly religious," may face different opposition from Americans, especially Republicans, Green said, "who like religious candidates who take their faith seriously."
Kelly Patterson, a Brigham Young University political scientist, is more optimistic about his church and possible Mormon candidates.
Patterson acknowledged that religion played heavily in the previous Romney campaign, partly because the former Massachusetts governor portrayed himself as a religious individual.
With that strategy, Romney invited some of the scrutiny of his faith, Patterson said. "The second time around, it won't be as important."
Politicians such as Rom