In my capacity as an editor for Baker Aca­demic and Brazos Press, I annually attend the meetings of the American Academy of Reli­gion and the Society of Bib­lical Litera­ture. These conferences al­ways provide occasion for reflection on current trends in theology and biblical studies. My major impression after the meetings held this past November was that there is a lack of any large-scale movements or trends in the theological academy. Begin­ning in the 1980s, biblical studies saw a massive output of work on Jesus of Nazareth—what is known as the Third Quest for the Historical Jesus. And in the late 1990s, Radical Ortho­doxy enlivened several packed sessions at the AAR. But nothing that is happening now is remotely on the scale of  those developments.

A biblical scholar re­marked to me that "biblical criticism is exhausted." But scholars continue to search for what lies after it. The­ology, meanwhile, seems to have broken into a wide variety of subfields with no one school of thought dominant. People seem reluctant to identify, let alone jump on, any particular bandwagon.

But one major formal development is worth noting. I mention it gingerly, because of what may be construed as a conflict of interest on my part. Though denominational and university presses continue to publish copious and important work, the center of gravity in publishing has arguably shifted to houses with evangelical bases or connections. The conspicuously large bookselling booths, and presumably concomitantly ro­bust sales, now belong to Eerdmans, InterVarsity Press, Baylor University Press and Baker Academic and Brazos Press.