Court says gay couples have equal rights

Use of term "marriage" not guaranteed
The New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled that the state’s constitution requires that marriage rights be available to same-sex couples on an equal basis with heterosexuals. But the court left it to state legislators to decide whether to refer to the unions by the term marriage or a different one.

The October 25 decision leaves New Jersey in a situation akin to Vermont’s, where legislators in 2000 created the nation’s first law legalizing civil unions for same-sex couples. Vermont’s civil unions, which followed a similar court decision, offer the same rights and benefits as marriage without being called that.

All seven New Jersey justices agreed that the state’s constitution requires it to extend to gay couples the same rights as married couples. However, only three justices said those rights include equal use of the term marriage, while the four-justice majority said use of the term is not guaranteed.

 

This article is available to subscribers only. Please subscribe for full access—subscriptions begin at $2.95. Already have an online account? Log in now. Already a print subscriber? Create an online account for no additional cost.

This article is available to subscribers only.

To post a comment, log inregister, or use the Facebook comment box.